![]() |
See breeze simulations are an ideal method to test the soundness of a model
implementation, because they show the behavior and the coupling between
fluid dynamics, turbulence, the soil module, and the radiation
parameterization. A straight analytical solution to the problem does not exist.
However, several studies have been carried out (Neumann and Mahrer; 1974; Pielke; 1984; Thunis; 1995; Xian and Pielke; 1991)
and therefore it is known how the correct solution should look like. To test
Metphomod a two-dimensional sea breeze situation with an island of 150 km
extent was simulated. We tried to reproduce the same situation as the
corresponding example in Xian and Pielke (1991). This was not fully possible since
Metphomod uses different parameterizations for soil atmosphere interactions
and for radiation than RAMS. The sea surface temperature, was set to 283 K, the
potential land surface temperature and the potential air temperature just above
the ground were set to 300 K. A potential temperature gradient of 4.5
K
km - 1, and an initial wind speed of 0 ms - 1 were set as
initial conditions. Soil parameters were set up to produce a similar heating
effect as found by Xian and Pielke (1991). The simulation was started for 17 June,
6 a.m. Figure 4 shows vertical and horizontal wind speeds, and
potential temperature at 3 p.m. The sea breeze front (SBF) can be clearly seen
in the figure. It travels from to the coast to the center of the island
according to theory (e.g. Simpson et al.; 1977). Although Metphomod uses
different parameterizations than RAMS and was applied in non-hydrostatic mode,
the results are similar to those of Xian and Pielke (1991) (Figure
5). The most important differences are: (1) the see breeze front
has a smaller horizontal extent, (2) a region with subsiding air is produced in
the middle of the island. This is due to the fact that Metphomod's
turbulence parameterization scheme leads to a less efficient mixing in regions
with low wind speeds which leads to a local high pressure area.