![]() |
To check the accuracy of the chemical solver several test calculations were carried out. The case presented here refers to case 19 a in Stockwell et al. (1997), which closely resembles the ``PLUME/2'' case in Kuhn et al. (1998). The box model results of our implementation of the Gong & Cho-solver were compared to results obtained using the Livermore ODE-Solver (Hindmarsh; 1983) which is technically based on the Gear-solver (Gear; 1971) and widely accepted as a reference. Furthermore, we compared the results with those obtained by Stockwell et al. (1997). Figure 7 shows an excellent agreement between the results of the Gong & Cho-Solver, and the Livermore solver. Only slight differences to the data of Stockwell et al. (1997) were found. They are mainly due to the different procedures of calculating photodissociation constants.